Professor of Logic

Women and Fish

Patrice O'Neal Patrice O'Neal
Share: Post Reddit

Elephant in the Room, 2011

Find on Amazon

“We're all at the lake. We all know what we're doing.”

In "Elephant in the Room," Patrice O'Neal constructs an extended metaphor comparing relationships to fishing. It sounds reductive. It sounds like something a frat bro would say. In Patrice's hands, it becomes something closer to poetry.

"Men are fishermen. Women are fish. Now, I know that sounds bad, but hear me out, because this is going to explain everything."

The metaphor builds methodically. The fisherman goes to the lake (the bar, the party, the dating app). He brings bait (money, humor, attention). He casts his line (approaches). The fish sees the bait and makes a decision. Both parties are exercising agency—the fisherman wants the fish, but the fish chooses whether to bite.

"See, the fish has all the power. The fish decides. The fisherman just sits there, hoping."

This is where Patrice gets interesting. The metaphor, which seemed to reduce women to objects, actually gives them all the agency. The fisherman is the desperate one. The fish is the one choosing.

"But here's where it gets complicated. Once the fish bites, the fisherman has to decide: is this a keeper? And the fish is thinking: is this the right hook? And neither one of them is being honest about what they actually want."

The bit expands. Different types of bait represent different dating strategies. Different fish represent different women. The lake has rules that both sides pretend don't exist. By the end, Patrice has built an entire ecosystem of relationship dynamics that's simultaneously absurd, offensive, and uncomfortably accurate.

"Every man who tells you he's not fishing is lying. And every woman who tells you she doesn't know she's a fish is lying too. We're all at the lake. We all know what we're doing. We just pretend we don't because pretending is part of the game."

The audience is split between people who think they're hearing misogyny and people who think they're hearing truth. Patrice would say the split itself proves his point: we can't even agree on what's happening because we're all too invested in the performance.